Yetty vs Webflow
Webflow is a pro design tool - for sites rebuilt inside Webflow. Yetty runs the exact site you already have, from any tool.
Webflow is genuinely powerful: pixel control on its canvas, a solid CMS, an Editor mode clients can use, and agency handoff done well. If you want to design in Webflow from day one, it's a fine home. The catch is the word inside: your site has to be rebuilt in Webflow's editor, its class system learned, and it stays on Webflow's hosting and plans.
Yetty starts from the site you already have - coded by hand, exported from Figma or another tool, written by your AI - and runs it as-is: click-to-edit content, a lead inbox with webhooks, SEO, analytics, versioned changes with one-click rollback. Nothing to relearn, no proprietary layer; the HTML stays yours and exports whole. Hand a client the dashboard, and let any AI run it over MCP.
| Yetty | Webflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Keep the exact site you have (no rebuild) | rebuild | |
| Works with sites from any tool or AI | ||
| Client edits text without a design tool | ||
| Forms → lead inbox + webhooks | capped | |
| SEO handled (titles, sitemap, share cards) | ||
| Versioned changes + 1-click rollback | ~ | |
| Full export (HTML + content), no lock-in | code only | |
| Run the whole site from any AI (MCP) | ~ | |
| Price for a real site on your domain | $13/site | $14-39/mo |
Webflow is its owners' trademark. Comparison reflects typical plans.
Which one is for you?
You already have a site from any tool and want it live and managed as-is - or you hand clients a CMS without moving everyone into Webflow.
You publish once and it's fully looked after - editing, leads, SEO, backups, rollback - from a simple dashboard or your own AI. Hand it to a client and they can run it too.
You're a designer who wants a visual canvas with fine control, and you'll build and maintain the site in Webflow.
Then Webflow is the better fit, and that's fine. Yetty is for the finished site that just needs to be live, editable and looked after.